The August 6 primary is 81 days away. Three candidates are running on Second Amendment platforms. None of them have answered the constitutional question that actually matters. That question is not whether they support the Second Amendment. Every Republican candidate in Tennessee supports the Second Amendment. The question is what they will do with actual authority when their oath, federal law, and the plain text of the Constitution collide on the same day.

Monty Fritts

Fritts has the most developed public position of the three candidates. He argues that how a politician views one right reveals how they view all of them. He connects the Second Amendment to broader natural law principles. He criticizes Nashville officials for using public funds to appeal Hughes v. Lee. He uses “Shall Not Be Infringed” as a constitutional anchor rather than a campaign slogan. That is more than most candidates offer. It is still not enough. His statement operates entirely at the level of philosophy. He does not mention Article VI. He does not mention 18 U.S.C. 922(g). He does not address the Oath of Office as a legal obligation with constitutional consequences.

John Rose

Rose is a fourth-term congressman, a Vanderbilt-trained attorney, and the first major candidate to enter the 2026 race. His public Second Amendment position is three paragraphs of borrowed rhetoric. He opens with a Ronald Reagan quote. He pledges to make Tennessee a true constitutional carry state, which is a position Tennessee already occupies. A Vanderbilt law degree and four terms in Congress mean Rose knows exactly what Article VI requires. His public statement makes no reference to it.

Marsha Blackburn

Blackburn’s statement describes her as a gun owner who understands the importance of protecting the right to bear arms. It acknowledges that gun violence is a problem. It commits her to working with members of both parties to reform the mental health system. Every major gun control bill of the last thirty years opens with identical framing. Blackburn is a sitting United States Senator who took an oath under Article VI. Her statement explicitly commits her to enacting policies that restrict arms access based on mental health status. That is not protecting the Second Amendment. That is managing its erosion while telling voters otherwise.

What Happens Next

Interview requests have been sent to all three candidates requesting a recorded conversation on the Second Amendment. No topics or questions were provided in advance. The interviews will be published in full and unedited. Non-responses will be published as well. Tennessee voters go to the polls on August 6.

Share this analysis: